Feature request #297
labels are missplaced
|Pull Request or Patch supplied:||Resolution:||duplicate|
See the screendump. There are labels 1246, 799 and 1205 in the center. Can you see them? Good.
The problem is that 1246 belongs to the selected, yellow-highlighted polygon, 799 to the greyish polygon and 1205 to the greenish one. But the way they are displayed, you wouldn't guess that they are. Zooming or playing with label positioning doesn't fix the problem. The 1246 is worst.
This is not a separated case - it is a common bug when displaying narrow, long polygons.
#1 Updated by Gavin Macaulay - over 11 years ago
Qgis currently displays polygon and linestring labels at the position given by the mean of the points that define the polygon or linestring. Label 1246 looks to be in the appropriate place under that scheme.
More intelligent placing of labels is something that we are planning for later releases of qgis. In the meantime, it is possible to use the 'Data defined position' abilities of the label dialog box to use data in your data source to place labels.
See ticket #54 for some other wishes to do with labels.
#2 Updated by Redmine Admin over 11 years ago
Maybe I don't get something, but the way I understand what you are saying means that the 1246 should be somewhere within the the polygon it belongs to, ie. the yellow-highlited one? But it's not, as yuo can see - it's way under that polygon. This is the main problem.
#6 Updated by Tim Sutton over 10 years ago
Replying to [comment:4 email@example.com]:
Thanks, now I get it.
In that case, I consider it a serious defect than convex shapes are labelled wrong "by design". I find it strange it's not planned to be fixed for 0.8 and that you consider it an "ehnacement".
We can only plan work if there is someone willing, available and able to do the work. Martn Dobias is planning to redo the labelling implementation at some stage, and until that time we only offer the simple centrod based labelling as currently available in QGIS. For 0.9 we will still have teh current labelling implementation so I am shifting this bug report over to 1.0. I'm leaving its status as 'Major' though since I do agree that its something we should try to resolve before the final QGIS Stable Version 1.0 release