Feature request #5724
Make r.* modules corresponding to those in GRASS plugin
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Assignee: |  Victor Olaya | ||
| Category: | Processing/GRASS | ||
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | fixed/implemented |
| Easy fix?: | No | Copied to github as #: | 15238 |
Description
Currently these modules are in sextante, not in the plugin:
r.flow
r.gwflow
r.horizon
r.info
r.mfilter.fp
r.profile
r.quantile
r.rescale.eq
r.ros, r.spreadpath, r.spread (useless? could be removed, see Markus N comments)
r.sim.sediment
r.sim.water
rr.sunmask
r.sun
r.terraflow.short
r.terraflow
r.topmodel
The following are in the plugin, not in sextante:
r.blend
r.category
r.colors.rast
r.colors.rules
r.colors.stddev
r.colors.table
r.lake.seed
r.lake.xy
r.mapcalc (the graphic calculator)
r.mask
r.null.null
r.null.to
r.null.val
r.reclass.area.greater
r.reclass.area.lesser
r.reclass.file
r.series
r.slope
r.support
r.support.stats
r.surf.fractal
r.texture.bis
r.to.null
r.what
Please help us defining which ones should be added.
The following have a different arrangement:
r.walk: split in r.walk.coord and r.walk.vect (plugin)
rr.sunmask (wrong name?): split in r.sunmask.date.time and r.sunmask.position
r.cost: split in r.cost.coord, r.cost.rast and r.cost.vect
r.contour: split in r.contour and r.contour2
To be checked if it's OK.
History
#1
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 12 years ago
r.slope added in r220
#2
Updated by Paolo Cavallini about 12 years ago
- Category set to 59
#3
Updated by Filipe Dias about 11 years ago
Perhaps it would be better to open individual tickets, stating which (if any) changes should be made to each individual algorithm?
#4
Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 11 years ago
leave this open, I plan to add the missing tools, if possible.
In general I'm not in favor of having just the options available in the grass plugins, because sometimes are missing important ones.
We should add the tools with all the options available, and then if necessary make also simplified versions with less parameters. It is the approach I used to fix recently a couple of modules.
#5
Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 10 years ago
- Category deleted (
59) - Project changed from 78 to QGIS Application
#6
Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 10 years ago
- Category set to Processing/GRASS
#7
Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 10 years ago
- Assignee set to Victor Olaya
#8
Updated by Médéric RIBREUX almost 9 years ago
Hello, bug triage...
as of today, only the following algorithms are not implemented into Processing:
- r.blend
- r.category
- r.colors.rast (r.colors)
- r.colors.rules (r.colors)
- r.colors.stddev
- r.colors.table (r.colors)
- r.cost.coord (r.cost)
- r.cost.rast (r.cost)
- r.cost.vect (r.cost)
- r.mapcalc (but covered in #6894)
- r.mask
- r.sunmask.datetime (covered in #14263)
- r.sunmask.position (covered in #14263)
- r.support
- r.support.stats
- r.surf.fractal
- r.texture.bis (r.texture)
- r.walk.coord (r.walk)
- r.walk.vect (r.walk)
- r.what
The following algorithms are already implemented with a different name:
- r.contour -> r.contour.step
- r.contour2 -> r.contour.level
- r.lake.seed -> r.lake.layer
- r.lake.xy -> r.lake.coords
- r.null.null -> r.null
- r.null.to -> r.null
- r.null.val -> r.null
- r.reclass.file -> r.reclass
For colors, the main problem is that I am not sure that we can make a GeoTiff with a color map that can be interpreted by QGIS.
This is the same for r.support (for metadata).
#9
Updated by Médéric RIBREUX over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to In Progress
Hello,
there is a PR for this !
It should implement everything that is implementable for GRASS7 r. modules...
#10
Updated by Alexander Bruy over 8 years ago
- Resolution set to fixed/implemented
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Pull-request was merged