Bug report #990
Geoprocessing/Buffer features plug-in - various defects: i18n, PG connection leak, fails to load buffer layer
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | ||
| Assignee: |  Gary Sherman | ||
| Category: | C++ Plugins | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | Regression?: | No | |
| Operating System: | All | Easy fix?: | No |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | Resolution: | fixed | |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | Copied to github as #: | 11050 |
Description
- Needs internationalization
- PostgreSQL connection left hanging on cancel or failure to buffer
- sometimes fails to load the buffer layer table when requested - seems to depend on the user
- "Buffer distance in map units" box should accept negative numbers; it is valid to do negative buffers, at least on polygons
- should show schemas the user has CREATE privilege on
- the geometry column needs to be "shape" - anything else fails
History
#1
Updated by Gary Sherman over 16 years ago
This plugin is a third-party plugin. The developers may not see this bug report.
#2
Updated by Horst Düster over 16 years ago
Replying to [comment:1 gsherman]:
This plugin is a third-party plugin. The developers may not see this bug report.
In the meantime there exists two plugins which offers buffering of geometries.
1. The C++ Geoprocessing Plugin delivered with QGIS
2. The third party python plugin "Geoprocessing"
Which plugin do you mean?
#3
Updated by Steven Mizuno over 16 years ago
Replying to [comment:2 hdus]:
Replying to [comment:1 gsherman]:
This plugin is a third-party plugin. The developers may not see this bug report.
In the meantime there exists two plugins which offers buffering of geometries.
1. The C++ Geoprocessing Plugin delivered with QGIS
2. The third party python plugin "Geoprocessing"Which plugin do you mean?
I was referring to the C++ Geoprocessing Plugin delivered with QGIS (qgspggeoprocessing.cpp)
#4
Updated by Horst Düster over 16 years ago
In priciple we should decide whether we keep the C++ plugin in the QGIS distribution or not. I believe that my new Geoprocessing plugin is much more flexible due to use of all OGR and PostGIS data sources. It is not neccessary to have two plugins doing the same.
#5
Updated by Jürgen Fischer about 16 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- Resolution set to fixed
the c++ plugin was removed
#6 Updated by Anonymous over 15 years ago
Milestone Version 1.0.0 deleted