Bug report #9760

Wrong EPSG:5514 and EPSG:102067 definition

Added by Michal Zimmermann about 10 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Category:Projection Support
Affected QGIS version:2.2.0 Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:up/downstream
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:18306


Those 2 CRS are defined as

+proj=krovak +lat_0=49.5 +lon_0=24.83333333333333 +alpha=30.28813972222222 +k=0.9999 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=bessel +towgs84=542.5,89.2,456.9,5.517,2.275,5.516,6.96 +pm=greenwich +units=m +no_defs

+proj=krovak +lat_0=49.5 +lon_0=24.83333333333333 +alpha=0 +k=0.9999 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=bessel +towgs84=570.8,85.7,462.8,4.998,1.587,5.261,3.56 +units=m +no_defs

is the right definition (see http://spatialreference.org/ref/sr-org/6634/proj4/)
Please fix this.


#1 Updated by Jürgen Fischer about 10 years ago

  • Category set to Projection Support

#2 Updated by Alexander Bruy about 10 years ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but seems this bug should go to GDAL trac, as we copy CRS definitions from GDAL

#3 Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 9 years ago

  • Resolution set to up/downstream
  • Status changed from Open to Closed

#4 Updated by Andre Joost almost 9 years ago

In this case, towgs84 paramters are not taken form GDAL (which still shows different values), but from this patch: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-commit/2013-June/010976.html

It would be nice to have them backported into GDAL.

Also available in: Atom PDF