Bug report #9760
Wrong EPSG:5514 and EPSG:102067 definition
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | High | ||
| Assignee: | - | ||
| Category: | Projection Support | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | 2.2.0 | Regression?: | No |
| Operating System: | Easy fix?: | No | |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | up/downstream |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 18306 |
Description
Those 2 CRS are defined as
+proj=krovak +lat_0=49.5 +lon_0=24.83333333333333 +alpha=30.28813972222222 +k=0.9999 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=bessel +towgs84=542.5,89.2,456.9,5.517,2.275,5.516,6.96 +pm=greenwich +units=m +no_defs
However,
+proj=krovak +lat_0=49.5 +lon_0=24.83333333333333 +alpha=0 +k=0.9999 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=bessel +towgs84=570.8,85.7,462.8,4.998,1.587,5.261,3.56 +units=m +no_defs
is the right definition (see http://spatialreference.org/ref/sr-org/6634/proj4/)
Please fix this.
History
#1
Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 10 years ago
- Category set to Projection Support
#2
Updated by Alexander Bruy over 10 years ago
Maybe I'm wrong, but seems this bug should go to GDAL trac, as we copy CRS definitions from GDAL
#3
Updated by Jürgen Fischer almost 10 years ago
- Resolution set to up/downstream
- Status changed from Open to Closed
#4
Updated by Andre Joost over 9 years ago
In this case, towgs84 paramters are not taken form GDAL (which still shows different values), but from this patch: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-commit/2013-June/010976.html
It would be nice to have them backported into GDAL.