Bug report #6939

Inconsistent CRS handling when adding WMS

Added by Jonathan Moules almost 9 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:-
Category:Web Services clients/WMS
Affected QGIS version:1.8.0 Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:16052

Description

I'm using 1.8.0 to connect to a GeoServer 2.2.2 - WMS 1.3.0.
I'm adding raster layers that have a declared and native projection in GeoServer of 27700 - British National Grid.

When I first bring up the "Add Layer(s) from Server" dialog for WMS and click a layer, the CRS is "WGS 84". Ok, that's also an acceptable CRS because its declared in GetCapabilities.
So I change it to 27700,n add the layer, then close the dialog. It appears just fine.

But then I go back into the "add layers" dialog and connect to the server again.
This time when I click on any of the layers, they're showing a projection of 27700.

HOWEVER - If I select a layer (make it blue), then deselect the layer, then select a layer again, it's back to WGS 84!
Surely it should stay as 27700 given that's now the project projection and is a support projection by the layer?

geoserver-GetCapabilities.xml Magnifier (159 KB) Jonathan Moules, 2013-01-03 09:59 AM


Related issues

Duplicates QGIS Application - Bug report #6962: Use bbox or first crs when multiple srs are advertised in... Closed 2013-01-08

Associated revisions

Revision a575711f
Added by Jürgen Fischer almost 9 years ago

use project projections instead of WGS84 for WMS crs preselection (fixes #6939)

History

#1 Updated by Jürgen Fischer almost 9 years ago

Are all layers available in 27700? Once you select layers that don't have the current crs selection commonly available the CRS switches to the first commonly available CRS of the selected layer or WGS84 if there isn't any.

#2 Updated by Jonathan Moules almost 9 years ago

Yep. Absolutely every single layer is available in 27700. Its the native format for all of our data.
You can see the get capabilities yourself in the attached which confirms this.

#3 Updated by Jürgen Fischer almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed

#4 Updated by Jonathan Moules almost 9 years ago

Wow, that was fast! Thanks. :-D

Also available in: Atom PDF