Feature request #6859

Add v.what.rast to GRASS toolbox

Added by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago. Updated over 8 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:Victor Olaya
Category:Processing/GRASS
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:fixed/implemented
Easy fix?:No Copied to github as #:15993

Description

It seems is missing something to allow sample a raster with a point vector.

History

#1 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug report to Feature request

#2 Updated by Victor Olaya almost 12 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Feedback

what about v.sample?

#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago

Hi Victor,

v.sample seems made to allow to compare the result of the sampling with an already available column of values and produce a raster that store the differences. While it is a indeed useful module (but that it seems not working in sextante, under testing) it is not what the vast majority if times is needed, just sample a raster (or vector, with v.what.vect).

cheers!

#4 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 10 years ago

  • Category deleted (59)
  • Project changed from 78 to QGIS Application

#5 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 10 years ago

  • Target version set to Future Release - Nice to have
  • Status changed from Feedback to Open
  • Category set to 94

#6 Updated by Alexander Bruy about 10 years ago

  • Category changed from 94 to Processing/GRASS

#7 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to In Progress

Hello,

I have made a PR for this feature request. It will be implemented in QGIS 2.16 beacuse we are in feature freeze period...

#8 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 9 years ago

Médéric RIBREUX wrote:

Hello,

I have made a PR for this feature request. It will be implemented in QGIS 2.16 beacuse we are in feature freeze period...

very nice! many thanks for that, it was a much missed module in Processing.

#9 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX over 8 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
  • Estimated time set to 2.00
  • Resolution set to fixed/implemented

Hello,

the PR has been merged and I am happy to close this feature request !

#10 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 8 years ago

Médéric RIBREUX wrote:

Hello,

the PR has been merged and I am happy to close this feature request !

Thanks!

Also available in: Atom PDF