Feature request #6859

Add v.what.rast to GRASS toolbox

Added by Giovanni Manghi about 7 years ago. Updated almost 4 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:Victor Olaya
Category:Processing/GRASS
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:fixed/implemented
Easy fix?:No Copied to github as #:15993

Description

It seems is missing something to allow sample a raster with a point vector.

History

#1 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 7 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug report to Feature request

#2 Updated by Victor Olaya about 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Feedback

what about v.sample?

#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 7 years ago

Hi Victor,

v.sample seems made to allow to compare the result of the sampling with an already available column of values and produce a raster that store the differences. While it is a indeed useful module (but that it seems not working in sextante, under testing) it is not what the vast majority if times is needed, just sample a raster (or vector, with v.what.vect).

cheers!

#4 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

  • Category deleted (59)
  • Project changed from 78 to QGIS Application

#5 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

  • Target version set to Future Release - Nice to have
  • Status changed from Feedback to Open
  • Category set to 94

#6 Updated by Alexander Bruy about 5 years ago

  • Category changed from 94 to Processing/GRASS

#7 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX almost 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to In Progress

Hello,

I have made a PR for this feature request. It will be implemented in QGIS 2.16 beacuse we are in feature freeze period...

#8 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 4 years ago

Médéric RIBREUX wrote:

Hello,

I have made a PR for this feature request. It will be implemented in QGIS 2.16 beacuse we are in feature freeze period...

very nice! many thanks for that, it was a much missed module in Processing.

#9 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX almost 4 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
  • Estimated time set to 2.00
  • Resolution set to fixed/implemented

Hello,

the PR has been merged and I am happy to close this feature request !

#10 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 4 years ago

Médéric RIBREUX wrote:

Hello,

the PR has been merged and I am happy to close this feature request !

Thanks!

Also available in: Atom PDF