Feature request #18374

Additional warp options

Added by Brett Hankerson over 2 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:-
Category:GDAL Tools
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:duplicate
Easy fix?:No Copied to github as #:26264

Description

In 3.0.0 there seems to be no way to give additional commands in the GDALWarpOptions family using the GUI. Creation options can be added via advanced parameters, but not warp options. In 2.XX, the menu bar tools had an editable console

creation parameters.PNG (36.8 KB) Brett Hankerson, 2018-03-08 02:47 PM

History

#1 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 2 years ago

  • Resolution set to duplicate
  • Status changed from Open to Closed

The tools are now all in the Processing toolbox. There is another ticket about letting the GDAL/OGR commands be editable how it was in QGIS GDAL tools.

#2 Updated by Brett Hankerson over 2 years ago

I realize this isn't a help forum, but if your answer could be a little more helpful, I'd greatly appreciate it. I cannot find any tool in the processing toolbox that allows the input of additional warp options (through the gui or by editable commands). For example, I wish to add the command "-wo CUTLINE_ALL_TOUCHED=TRUE". How can I do that? Thank you for your time

#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 2 years ago

Brett Hankerson wrote:

I realize this isn't a help forum, but if your answer could be a little more helpful, I'd greatly appreciate it. I cannot find any tool in the processing toolbox that allows the input of additional warp options (through the gui or by editable commands). For example, I wish to add the command "-wo CUTLINE_ALL_TOUCHED=TRUE".

there is not, this is why there is a ticket asking to restore this functionality we had in "gdal tools" also for the gdal based tools in the Processing toolbox. Cheers!.

#4 Updated by Brett Hankerson over 2 years ago

Ok, thank you! Yes, I've seen that ticket, but it is labeled "rejected" & "duplicate" (if we are both talking about the same ticket, #15090), or there is ticket #11323, which has been "in progress" since Jan 2016.
I propose something different than either of those tickets (though only slightly, and with no change in the end result). In keeping with the goal of user-friendliness, why not add another box of "additional warp parameters" under "Advanced parameters", in exactly the same way that "additional creation parameters [optional]" are available?

#5 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 2 years ago

Brett Hankerson wrote:

Ok, thank you! Yes, I've seen that ticket, but it is labeled "rejected" & "duplicate" (if we are both talking about the same ticket, #15090), or there is ticket #11323, which has been "in progress" since Jan 2016.
I propose something different than either of those tickets (though only slightly, and with no change in the end result). In keeping with the goal of user-friendliness, why not add another box of "additional warp parameters" under "Advanced parameters", in exactly the same way that "additional creation parameters [optional]" are available?

this I would be probably be able to do. Add a feature request. Thanks.

Also available in: Atom PDF