Bug report #12801

Processing: "Join attributes table" doesn't work in batch mode

Added by Filipe Dias over 5 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:High
Assignee:Victor Olaya
Category:Processing/QGIS
Affected QGIS version:master Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:Yes Resolution:fixed/implemented
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:20897

Description

Load four shapefiles (eg s1,s2, s3 and s4)

Run join attributes table as a batch process

Set up: Join s2 to s1 and s4 to s3

A message like this will show up: Error:"Missing parameter value: Input layer 2 (row 1) (see screenshot)

The same operations work as expected when run individually.

bug_report.PNG (250 KB) Filipe Dias, 2015-05-21 08:41 AM

temp.7z (3 KB) Joana Marcelino, 2015-05-22 02:00 AM

History

#1 Updated by Joana Marcelino over 5 years ago

I attach the shapefiles so you can reproduce the error.

#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

  • Pull Request or Patch supplied changed from No to Yes

#4 Updated by Alexander Bruy over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Feedback

Should be fixed in master. Please check

#5 Updated by Filipe Dias over 5 years ago

With the attached sample data, I'm still getting an error.

#6 Updated by Joana Marcelino over 5 years ago

I also tested the attached sample data in Windows, and it's not working either.

#7 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

Filipe Dias wrote:

With the attached sample data, I'm still getting an error.

the latest master in osgeo4w or nightly repositories does not include yet the fix. Try again tomorrow.

#8 Updated by Filipe Dias over 5 years ago

I tested with the most recent code, downloaded today

#9 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

Filipe Dias wrote:

I tested with the most recent code, downloaded today

just tested myself and it works, no error messages.

#10 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed
  • Resolution set to fixed/implemented

#11 Updated by Filipe Dias over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened

I tested on Ubuntu 14.04 and on a different machine with Windows 7 with a clean install and still got this bug.

Can anyone else please test with the attached sample data?

#12 Updated by Alexander Bruy over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Reopened to Feedback

Just tested with latest master (738838a) under Linux and Windows and it works fine.

#13 Updated by Filipe Dias over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

I can confirm it's fixed.

The problem I was having now resulted from not having deleted a third empty line.

Also available in: Atom PDF