Bug report #12657
Processing/GRASS don't work under Windows if username or input/output paths have non ascii chars
Status: | Closed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | ||
Assignee: | Victor Olaya | ||
Category: | Processing/GRASS | ||
Affected QGIS version: | 3.4.4 | Regression?: | No |
Operating System: | Windows | Easy fix?: | No |
Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | fixed/implemented |
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 20770 |
Description
Already discussed with Victor and Alexander. The issue has no easy solution apparently.
If the username has non ascii chars in it Processing returns the error message saying that GRASS is not installed.
If the non ascii chars are in the input/output paths then the modules run but ultimately fail.
This is no issue under Linux.
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 9 years ago
- Affected QGIS version changed from 2.8.1 to master
- Priority changed from Normal to High
- Target version set to Future Release - High Priority
#2 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to In Progress
Hello,
I am working on it (only made with GRASS7)...
Following my work on #9425, I found a way to use input and output files with mbcs characters in their name for GRASS7 algorithms.
I have made the fix tests on MS-Windows XP for the moment (the only VM with MS I have). I will try it on MS-Windows 7 next week and make a Pull-Request for this soon (so you can test it).
Stay tuned !
#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 8 years ago
thanks!
#4 Updated by Médéric RIBREUX over 8 years ago
#5 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 8 years ago
- Pull Request or Patch supplied changed from No to Yes
#6 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 7 years ago
- Target version deleted (
Future Release - High Priority) - Priority changed from High to Normal
- Status changed from In Progress to Open
#7 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 7 years ago
- Easy fix? set to No
- Regression? set to No
#8 Updated by Victor Olaya almost 6 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
Things seem to be fine in 3.4.
Should this be closed?
#9 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 6 years ago
Victor Olaya wrote:
Things seem to be fine in 3.4.
Should this be closed?
I will check ASAP.
#10 Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 6 years ago
- Resolution set to fixed/implemented
- Pull Request or Patch supplied changed from Yes to No
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- Affected QGIS version changed from master to 3.4.4
yes, it seems fixed!