Bug report #7584

spatial query tool fails to return the right selection

Added by Giovanni Manghi about 11 years ago. Updated about 11 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Severe/Regression
Assignee:-
Category:C++ Plugins
Affected QGIS version:1.8.0 Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:invalid
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:16519

Description

try the attached sample project/data

try selecting something in the "sample_clc" layer using a spatial operator (ex: overlaps) and the "sampling_plots_1999" layer.

As you can see in the attached screenshot a few features are not selected and should be.

sample.zip (1.56 MB) Giovanni Manghi, 2013-04-11 12:14 PM

54.png (334 KB) Giovanni Manghi, 2013-04-11 12:14 PM

31.png (509 KB) Giovanni Manghi, 2013-04-14 09:41 AM

spatialquery.png (177 KB) vinayan Parameswaran, 2013-04-14 10:29 AM

History

#1 Updated by vinayan Parameswaran about 11 years ago

The overlaps as per the screen-shot seem to be the correct result to me..if a feature is completely contained inside another feature, overlap is false..the unselected items in the screenshot are completely with the polygons from other layer

#2 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 11 years ago

vinayan Parameswaran wrote:

The overlaps as per the screen-shot seem to be the correct result to me..if a feature is completely contained inside another feature, overlap is false..the unselected items in the screenshot are completely with the polygons from other layer

right.

Would you mind having a look a this new screenshot? I have another doubt about the "is disjoint" operator, and why does not select that (unselected) polygons.

#3 Updated by vinayan Parameswaran about 11 years ago

The attached screen-shot is the top left corner of sampling_plots_1999 -> Object with Fid = 18. Consider changing sample_clc_grass to a simple line type symbology. As seen in the screen-shots, there are small gaps between the two layers. So although, it visually confused me initially, it is reporting the correct results :)

#4 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 11 years ago

  • Resolution set to invalid
  • Status changed from Open to Closed

Also available in: Atom PDF