Bug report #7410

The thickness of the line in 'line decoration' and 'simple line' symbols are not rendered in the same way

Added by Salvatore Larosa almost 11 years ago. Updated over 10 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Severe/Regression
Assignee:Marco Hugentobler
Category:Symbology
Affected QGIS version:master Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:fixed
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:16377

Description

In current master branch if I define the same thickness (Pen width) for line decoration
and symbol line they are rendering in different way both preview and map canvas.

I have noticed this using the TopoViewer plugin.

I attached two images, before and after of merging the branch.

(See also: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-March/024959.html)

line_decoration_before.png (63 KB) Salvatore Larosa, 2013-03-21 08:37 AM

line_decoration_after.png (72.5 KB) Salvatore Larosa, 2013-03-21 08:37 AM

History

#1 Updated by Sandro Santilli almost 11 years ago

This is still happening as of 83445af, it's pretty annoying.
I shall also notice that there's no way to obtain the old aspect of the arrow in term of angle and length.
Salvatore: do you also have a commit id for what you refer to as "merging the branch" point?

#2 Updated by Salvatore Larosa almost 11 years ago

Hi Sandro,
I was referring to the branch 6afd9f4 [0].

[0] - http://tinyurl.com/ohzuc5m

#3 Updated by Marco Hugentobler almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed

Linewidth is fixed in 2e89e25eda743f96a4ca0abdb920e1b9a6e85ecc

#4 Updated by Sandro Santilli almost 11 years ago

Confirmed with 2e89e25e - thanks a lot Marco !

#5 Updated by Sandro Santilli over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Reopened

Marco: when you select a line the bogus (bigger) arrow gets back.

#6 Updated by Sandro Santilli over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Reopened to Closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

Fixed with commit:31f5ba90d191976858220a8e124d633dba769e50

#7 Updated by Sandro Santilli over 10 years ago

Sorry I forgot to push. now pushed as 3f3ce480cf88088c24face9c6fcaa1bbcbb369a0

Also available in: Atom PDF