Bug report #3630
Coordinate reference system ETRS89/UTM zone 33N (EPSG: 25833) is wrong
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | ||
| Assignee: |  nobody - | ||
| Category: | Projection Support | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | Regression?: | No | |
| Operating System: | OS X | Easy fix?: | No |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | Resolution: | worksforme | |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | Copied to github as #: | 13689 |
Description
The polygons of shape-files created/converted in zone ETRS89/UTM 33N (EPSG: 25833) are at the wrong place (about 1000 km to far west). The facts have been checked with other GIS programs.
History
#1
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 13 years ago
Replying to monokultur:
. The facts have been checked with other GIS programs.
this means it only happens in qgis or in all the sw you have tested?
#2
Updated by monokultur - over 13 years ago
It only happens in qgis. All other gis programs are projecting the polygones at the right place.
#3
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 13 years ago
can you please attach a sample data?
#4
Updated by monokultur - over 13 years ago
The attached file shows some fields in north-east germany. you can check with the digital ortho photos (wms-server url: http://www.geodaten-mv.de/dienste/adv_dop) if they are at the right place (the photos are visible only at a certain scale)
#5
Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 13 years ago
Replying to [comment:4 monokultur]:
The attached file shows some fields in north-east germany. you can check with the digital ortho photos (wms-server url: http://www.geodaten-mv.de/dienste/adv_dop) if they are at the right place (the photos are visible only at a certain scale)
In [[EPSG25833"httpspatialreferenceorgrefepsg25833] the x coordinates usually has only 6 digits Unfortunately what MV (and also Brandenburg) calls EPSG25833 is EPSG25833 with an offset of 33000000m (and formerly only 3000000m) On ["Hinweise Geowebdienste - GeoPortal Mecklenburg-Vorpommern"httpwwwgeoportal-mvdeland-mvGeoPortalMV_proddeGeowebdiensteHinweise_Geowebdiensteindexjsp#epsgportal this is called EPSG35833 and explictly marked as not OGC conformant I've also found ["sources]] that call this BBG:25833 and also have "our" definition of EPSG:25833.
I'm not sure how we should deal with this.
#6
Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 13 years ago
Replying to [comment:5 jef]:
Same for the shape moved 33000000m westward and set to EPSG:25833.
#7
Updated by monokultur - over 13 years ago
Is it possible to integrate EPSG: 35833 into qgis?
#8
Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 13 years ago
Replying to [comment:7 monokultur]:
Is it possible to integrate EPSG: 35833 into qgis?
Does that help? E.g. it won't on OGC services that are advertised with EPSG:25833.
BTW which other softwares did you try this with?
#9
Updated by Jürgen Fischer over 13 years ago
- Resolution set to worksforme
- Status changed from Open to Closed
closing for the lack of feedback.