Bug report #16826
Range widget: ridiculously large minimum and maximum values
Status: | Feedback | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Low | ||
Assignee: | - | ||
Category: | Edit widget | ||
Affected QGIS version: | master | Regression?: | No |
Operating System: | Easy fix?: | No | |
Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | |
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 24725 |
Description
For an attribute with a Postgis data type of numeric(9.3) the range edit widgets suggests ridiculously large minimum and maximum values:
Min: 179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448
Max:
179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448
In my opinion, something more reasonable should be piced as defaults.
History
#1 Updated by Andreas Neumann over 7 years ago
Andreas Neumann wrote:
For an attribute with a Postgis data type of numeric(9.3) the range edit widgets suggests ridiculously large minimum and maximum values:
Min: 179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448
Max:
179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448In my opinion, something more reasonable should be chosen as defaults.
#2 Updated by Andreas Neumann over 7 years ago
- Subject changed from Range widget: ridulously large minimum and maximum values to Range widget: ridiculously large minimum and maximum values
#3 Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
Please check if this issue is still valid on QGIS 3.4.5 or 3.6.