Bug report #15577

qgis3/master make install runs 2to3 on output tree, but install from source tree

Added by Richard Duivenvoorde about 8 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:-
Category:Build/Install
Affected QGIS version:master Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:invalid
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:23501

Description

Compiling current master (Qt5/Python3) and running make install, installs and runs fine except for the python parts:

testing Python3/Qt5 I get the following message:

File
"/home/richard/apps/qgis3/master/debug/share/qgis/python/plugins/processing/tools/vector.py",
line 34, in
    import cStringIO

See https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-September/044696.html

Mathieu's conclusion is: "The probem has to do with make install copying python files from the source tree not the output directory (therefore not benefiting from 2to3)"

So we should either run 2to3 on output tree AND install python from there (with fixed files)
OR
run 2to3 on source tree AND copy/install that one
OR
run 2to3 after installation in installed directory?

History

#1 Updated by Jürgen Fischer about 8 years ago

Yes, we'll eventually run 2to3 on the source files.

#2 Updated by Richard Duivenvoorde about 8 years ago

but in general, shouldn't we install (python) files from the build directory anyway (instead of the source dir)?

#3 Updated by Jürgen Fischer about 8 years ago

Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

but in general, shouldn't we install (python) files from the build directory anyway (instead of the source dir)?

Why? The python files are not built.

#4 Updated by Richard Duivenvoorde about 8 years ago

Well, at the moment the python files are a sort of 'build' (if you define building a little broader then going from source to binary). Also if we would have some other kind if 'builds', like for example beautifying the code or so, it would make more sense to 'install' from the build dir?

My reasoning is, why not install from it? It is not a true build in Computer science way, but we already have the usecase that apparently we install something which apparently needed another ( build ;-) ) step before to be usable in a installation? In current master (Python3/Qt5) an install does not have processing and throws the error.

But if there are other reasons to not install python from build, I'm fine with it for now.

#5 Updated by Mathieu Pellerin - nIRV about 8 years ago

  • Resolution set to invalid
  • Status changed from Open to Closed

This issue has been invalidated by the commit which ran 2to3 against the source directory.

Thanks Jürgen.

Also available in: Atom PDF