Bug report #17547
WMS properties are not detected
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | High | ||
| Assignee: | - | ||
| Category: | Web Services clients/WMS | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | master | Regression?: | No |
| Operating System: | Easy fix?: | No | |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | Yes | Resolution: | fixed/implemented |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 25444 |
Description
When right-clicking on a WMS layer in the Browser panel and selecting Properties the Layer Properties window opens but shows only calculated properties for layer. None of the information from the GetCapabilites of the service is shown.
The GetCapabilities response for the service / layer shown in the figure is below:
http://ogc.bgs.ac.uk/cgi-bin/TFL-PSI/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilitiesx%x%
===
QGIS version
2.99.0-Master
QGIS code revision
cd0ba91
Compiled against Qt
5.5.1
Running against Qt
5.5.1
Compiled against GDAL/OGR
2.2.2
Running against GDAL/OGR
2.2.2
Compiled against GEOS
3.5.1-CAPI-1.9.1
Running against GEOS
3.5.1-CAPI-1.9.1 r4246
PostgreSQL Client Version
9.5.2
SpatiaLite Version
4.3.0a
QWT Version
6.1.2
PROJ.4 Version
492
QScintilla2 Version
2.9.1
This copy of QGIS writes debugging output.
History
#1
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 6 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
- Operating System deleted (
Linux Mint 18.1 Serena (4.4.0-101-generic))
#2
Updated by Etienne Trimaille over 6 years ago
Information from the GetCapabilities should come back as in QGIS 2 with this PR https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5700
But the Metadata wizard won't be filled automatically from the GetCapabilities anyway for now.
#3
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 6 years ago
- Pull Request or Patch supplied changed from No to Yes
Updated by 
#5
Updated by James Passmore over 5 years ago
Alexander Bruy wrote:
Still true?
It works for me now in version 3.4.4, with everything dumped into the Information from provider section.
It would be nicer if the Identification / (Service) Extent / Access / Contacts information sections were actually populated, rather than being part of the first section, because at first glance it appears they are missing.
#6
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago
- Resolution set to fixed/implemented
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
It would be nicer if the Identification / (Service) Extent / Access / Contacts information sections were actually populated, rather than being part of the first section, because at first glance it appears they are missing.
file a feature request