Commit
…rtyname
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
9 comments
on commit 24737be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rldhont Hi, good practices are to use PR's to have a review process. Any objection to follow that ?
Cheers
Régis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@haubourg no objection, but it's hard to maintain 2 and 3, the code is not the same!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fail to see the relation between PR process and code complexity ..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
release-2_14 b7c566b
I think you can leave 2.14. It is no more released since 3.0 release, as far as I know...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DelazJ the transition to QGIS Server 2.18 is not so easy because of some issues...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you still releasing 2.14 on your side @rldhont? No more release of 2.14 since January according to the roadmap: https://www.qgis.org/ca/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#release-schedule
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Gustry yes, some customers continue to use it with their own package for QGIS Server.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I must have missed something, that PR points to master. I was expecting a PR for master. Backports of unmaintained branch can probably be pushed directly.
I think this should be uppercase (and probably static).