https://issues.qgis.org/https://issues.qgis.org/favicon.ico2010-06-07T05:11:53ZQGIS Issue TrackingQGIS Application - Bug report #2598: Polygon fill patterns scale differently in pdf export as raster versus non-rasterhttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/2598?journal_id=218242010-06-07T05:11:53ZMarco Hugentoblermarco.hugentobler@sourcepole.ch
<ul><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>wontfix</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul><p>This is a Qt but (<a class="external" href="http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-5114">http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-5114</a>). It works if you print to raster because QPainter then renders to image first and then embedds the image into the pdf.<br />No idea why the patch in the ticket is not applied to the qt sources. I tested with a patched Qt and it worked properly.</p>
<p>And note: it only works for symbology-ng 'svgFill' types. The hardcoded polygon fill hatches are printed as raster by QBrush, so won't scale nicely on printout.</p>
<p>Closing the ticket because it is not a bug in QGIS (though I understand it is annoying for users).</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #2598: Polygon fill patterns scale differently in pdf export as raster versus non-rasterhttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/2598?journal_id=218252010-06-07T07:38:18ZJohn Tull
<ul></ul><p>Thanks for your comments on this, Marco. I recall, vaguely, that we discussed this in email at some point in the past. Your clarification is useful and should help others that might come across this issue.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #2598: Polygon fill patterns scale differently in pdf export as raster versus non-rasterhttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/2598?journal_id=218262011-05-11T00:13:26ZJürgen Fischerjef@norbit.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Closed</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> deleted (<del><i>wontfix</i></del>)</li></ul> QGIS Application - Bug report #2598: Polygon fill patterns scale differently in pdf export as raster versus non-rasterhttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/2598?journal_id=218272011-05-11T00:13:33ZJürgen Fischerjef@norbit.de
<ul><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>upstream</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul>