https://issues.qgis.org/https://issues.qgis.org/favicon.ico2018-07-04T10:34:57ZQGIS Issue TrackingQGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=906632018-07-04T10:34:57ZGiovanni Manghigiovanni.manghi@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>Are the data really corrupted or is just a visualization problem within QGIS?</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=907062018-07-05T15:40:22ZEmma Gauseegause@apple.com
<ul></ul><p>Giovanni Manghi wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Are the data really corrupted or is just a visualization problem within QGIS?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hello,<br />After the query is applied, the data in the attribute table is changed. However, if you remove the query then the data goes back to its original values. <br />This does not happen in QGIS 3.0 - I tried the same query with the same data and it worked just fine.</p>
<p>Best,<br />Emma</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=911252018-07-27T15:39:50ZOlcay Ebcinolcay.ebcin@odakent.com.tr
<ul><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/download/13034/3%20-%20feat_id%20and%20%20No%20Filter.png">3 - feat_id and No Filter.png</a> added</li><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/download/13032/1%20-%20fid%20and%20Filter.png">1 - fid and Filter.png</a> added</li><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/download/13033/2%20-%20feat_id%20and%20Filter.png">2 - feat_id and Filter.png</a> added</li></ul><p>Hi,<br />I have exactly the same problem in QGIS 3.2<br />I attached 3 screenshots for the same GEOPACKAGE FEATURE which is "Sewer Node".<br />If I use "fid" name as Primary Key field, then I have no problem with or Without Filter both in labeling and feature attribute. (find screenshot 1.png)<br />If I use different name for Primary Key like "feat_id" and use Filter, you will see that there is a problem both in labeling and feature attributes. (find screenshot 2.png)<br />If I dont use a Filter, then I have no problem whatever the Primary Key name is. (find screenshot 3.png)</p>
<p>in QGIS 3.0 there is no such problem. Also, there is no problem in postgis database.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />Olcay</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=911422018-07-30T09:01:15ZGiovanni Manghigiovanni.manghi@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Crashes QGIS or corrupts data</strong> changed from <i>Yes</i> to <i>No</i></li><li><strong>Category</strong> changed from <i>Expressions</i> to <i>Vectors</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Open</i></li><li><strong>Regression?</strong> changed from <i>No</i> to <i>Yes</i></li></ul> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=934092018-09-25T08:44:43ZOlcay Ebcinolcay.ebcin@odakent.com.tr
<ul></ul><p>Hi,<br />Is anybody working on this issue?<br />Problem still exists.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=936992018-10-02T01:06:43ZNyall Dawson
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>Can you share the project/data? It's not possible to reproduce this without it.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=937302018-10-02T18:54:25ZOlcay Ebcinolcay.ebcin@odakent.com.tr
<ul><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/download/13403/test_data.gpkg">test_data.gpkg</a> added</li></ul><p>Dear Nyall,<br />Please find attached geopackage file.<br />if you filter features as row_status=1 and identify or label features,<br />you will see the difference.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=937882018-10-03T13:12:50ZGiovanni Manghigiovanni.manghi@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>V3.2: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUES</i> to <i>Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUES</i></li><li><strong>Affected QGIS version</strong> changed from <i>3.2</i> to <i>3.3(master)</i></li><li><strong>Operating System</strong> deleted (<del><i>Mac OSX</i></del>)</li></ul><p>Olcay Ebcin wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear Nyall,<br />Please find attached geopackage file.<br />if you filter features as row_status=1 and identify or label features,<br />you will see the difference.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>yeah, applying this filter on the provided datasource makes the attributes change in a very strange (and very wrong) way...<br />Tested also on master/linux.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=981932019-01-14T22:52:47ZNyall Dawson
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Open</i></li></ul> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=989202019-01-25T00:35:20ZNyall Dawson
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>I cannot reproduce. Can someone share a screencast demonstrating this?</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #19330: Provider Feature Filter Query Builder - CHANGES ATTRIBUTE VALUEShttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/19330?journal_id=1027912019-03-09T16:01:35ZGiovanni Manghigiovanni.manghi@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>not reproducable</i></li></ul><p>This does not seems reproducable anymore on 3.6 at least, please reopen if necessary.</p>