https://issues.qgis.org/https://issues.qgis.org/favicon.ico2018-06-01T12:55:48ZQGIS Issue TrackingQGIS Application - Bug report #17817: WFS vs WMS (OGR?) data typeshttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/17817?journal_id=899972018-06-01T12:55:48ZEven Rouaulteven.rouault@spatialys.com
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>Low</i></li></ul><p>ok, so this is a QGIS 2.x only issue, as things seem to work well in QGIS 3<br />The root cause is that the 'identification' column is reported as xs:decimal by DescribeFeatureType, and xs:decimal can potentially a floating point value, hence QGIS correctly decides to expose it as a double. If the server reported it as a xs:long or xs:string, that should work better</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #17817: WFS vs WMS (OGR?) data typeshttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/17817?journal_id=984182019-01-20T23:34:47ZJürgen Fischerjef@norbit.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Open</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>Please test with QGIS 3.4 - QGIS 2.18 reached it's end of life.</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #17817: WFS vs WMS (OGR?) data typeshttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/17817?journal_id=985452019-01-21T07:10:02ZRichard Duivenvoorde
<ul><li><strong>Resolution</strong> set to <i>wontfix</i></li></ul><p>Closing, as indeed it is working in 3.x</p> QGIS Application - Bug report #17817: WFS vs WMS (OGR?) data typeshttps://issues.qgis.org/issues/17817?journal_id=1007182019-02-24T00:50:55ZGiovanni Manghigiovanni.manghi@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul>